The statement is emphasizing that ranking, or the
position of an educational institution in a list or hierarchy, should not be
the primary criterion for assessing the quality of education. Instead, the
focus should be on the practical utility or usefulness of the knowledge and
skills acquired through education.
Here's a breakdown:
1. Ranking is not the basis for assessing education:This
implies that simply looking at where an educational institution stands in a
ranking system (such as global university rankings) shouldn't be the sole or
primary factor in evaluating the effectiveness or value of the education
provided.
2. The extent to which knowledge can be useful:This
suggests that a more meaningful measure of the quality of education is the
practical application and relevance of the knowledge and skills gained. The
emphasis is on the real-world applicability of what students learn.
In essence, the statement is advocating for an
approach to education assessment that goes beyond superficial rankings and
instead considers the tangible benefits and applicability of the knowledge
acquired in the educational process. It reflects a perspective that values
education for its ability to equip individuals with skills and insights that
can be actively applied in various contexts and contribute to personal and
societal development.
Komentar
Posting Komentar